The trade policy saga continues. This week, a U.S. Court of International Trade ruled President Trump’s sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs illegal; however, within 24 hours, the Appeals Court temporarily paused that decision. Through it all, equities are heading higher as the short week closes.
This week the S&P 500 (+1.9%), NASDAQ 100 (+2.1%) and small caps (Solactive 200 +1.6%) all made solid advances. Within the U.S. Large Cap Index, all 11 sectors are in the green, with the largest cohort, information technology (+2.8%), making the largest gain.
Internationally, equities also fared well. In Europe, the Stoxx 50 advanced +80 basis points (bps), and in Japan, the TOPIX increased by +2.8%.
In fixed income, yields, especially on the long end of the curve, have rallied. The 20- and 30-year yields are both lower about 10 bps for the week, while the 10-year (4.42%) rallied about 9 bps.
Below we delve deeper into the trade policy saga and highlight three opportunities we believe persist through the uncertainty.
The latest in the tariff saga. On Thursday evening, a federal appeals court temporarily paused a ruling against President Donald Trump’s global tariffs while considering a longer-lasting hold on the decision. The appeal follows a Wednesday evening decision from the U.S. Court of International Trade, which blocked most of President Trump’s recent tariffs, ruling that the administration wrongly invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
What does that mean? In short, reciprocal tariffs are still in effect for now. But the first ruling, which declared the tariffs illegal, is a reminder that these tariffs are not codified into law by Congress, and uncertainty remains.
The details: Congress has the authority to impose taxes and tariffs, but it did not pass a law for President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs. These tariffs were enacted under the IEEPA, which allows the President to declare a national emergency and regulate imports. However, the U.S. Court unanimously ruled that the administration misused IEEPA, halting these tariffs, including a 10% universal rate and earlier tariffs on China, Mexico and Canada. The Justice Department argued that this decision interfered with government diplomacy and Trump’s authority in foreign affairs, requesting the Federal Circuit to pause the ruling while they appealed.